Revision for “Razorcake” created on March 27, 2018 @ 18:29:07

&nbsp; <h2>Publication analysis</h2> <hr /> <h4>About the publication</h4> <strong>Title:</strong> <em>Razorcake</em> <strong>ISSN</strong>: 1533-7464 (Print)[1. <em>Razorcake, </em>Ulrichsweb Global Serials Directory, accessed March 27, 2018, <a href="http://ulrichsweb.serialssolutions.com.libaccess.sjlibrary.org/title/1522200376931/416432" target="_blank" rel="noopener">http://ulrichsweb.serialssolutions.com.libaccess.sjlibrary.org/title/1522200376931/416432</a>] <strong>Website:</strong> <a title="Razorcake" href="http://www.razorcake.org/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">http://www.razorcake.org/</a> <strong>Purpose, objective, or mission:</strong> "<em>Razorcake</em> provides consistent coverage of do-it-yourself punk culture that you won’t find anywhere else. We believe in positive, progressive, community-friendly DIY punk. We do our part."[2. "Mission Statement," Razorcake.org, accessed October 28, 2016, http://razorcake.org/mission-statement/] <em>Razorcake</em>'s philosophy is as simple as it is rare: cover, support, foster, and celebrate a vibrant independent artistic community that lives well below corporate media'€™s radar. Coverage includes some of the most in-depth interviews of the underground and features a staff of over 180 writers, photographers, graphic designers, and comic book artists.[3. "<a href="http://razorcake.org/mission-statement/">Mission Statement</a>."] <strong>Target audience:</strong> Anyone interested in DIY punk culture. [4. "<a href="http://razorcake.org/mission-statement/">Mission Statement</a>."] <strong>Publisher:</strong> Razorcake/Gorksy Press, Inc.[5. "<a href="http://razorcake.org/mission-statement/">Mission Statement</a>."] <strong>Peer reviewed?</strong> No. <strong>Type:</strong> Civilian webzine and fanzine.[6. "<a href="http://razorcake.org/mission-statement/">Mission Statement</a>."] <strong>Medium:</strong> Print and online. <strong>Content:</strong> Music, book, and zine reviews; guest opinions; web comics; and international "€œscene"€ reports, written by over 180 regular writers, graphic artists, and photographers.[7. "Razorcake," Razorcake.org, accessed October 28, 2016, <a href="http://razorcake.org/category/home/">http://razorcake.org/category/home/</a>] <strong>Frequency of publication:</strong> The zine is published bimonthly[8. "Razorcake Subscription," Razorcake.org, accessed October 28, 2016, <a href="http://razorcake.org/subscribe-to-the-zine/">http://razorcake.org/subscribe-to-the-zine/</a>], and the website updated regularly. <h4>About the publication's submission guidelines</h4> <strong>Location of submission guidelines:</strong> <a href="http://archive.razorcake.org/faqs#5">http://archive.razorcake.org/faqs#5</a> <strong>Types of contributions accepted:</strong> According to the FAQs, most of publication is written by staff. As stated in their FAQs, "A good way to start out is to send us a live review of a show you went to or reviews of recently released music you purchased and have written about. We appreciate attention to detail. If you can follow the format of reviews on our site, pick bands that make sense being on this site, and write an engaging review, we pay much more attention to that than a resume. Send your finished review to our zine editor for consideration."[9. ""FAQ," Razorcake.org, accessed October 28, 2016, <a href="http://archive.razorcake.org/faqs#5">http://archive.razorcake.org/faqs#5</a>] <strong>Submission and review process:</strong> Submissions by email, see <a href="http://archive.razorcake.org/faqs#5">FAQ</a> and <a href="http://razorcake.org/contact/">Contact</a>. Submissions approved by editorial staff. Writers are not paid for articles, but they do retain full copyright of their work.[10. "<a href="http://archive.razorcake.org/faqs#5">FAQ</a>."] <strong>Editorial tone:</strong> Casual but varies considerably. While some utilize brazen humor, as well as profanity, all articles are engaging, thought provoking, and executed with a strong grasp of grammar and consistent, effective voice. <strong>Style guide used:</strong> None specified. <h4>Conclusion: Evaluation of publication's potential for LIS authors</h4> <em>Razorcake</em> is a fine example of a nontraditional and groundbreaking opportunity that is commonly overlooked by the professional community. <em>Razorcake</em>'s main focus is music, but there is potential for interviews, commentary, and intellectual freedom articles to name but a few. The creative, informative, and social benefits for information professionals is limited only by imagination and creativity. &nbsp; <h2>Audience analysis</h2> <hr /> <h4>About the publication's readers</h4> <strong>Publication circulation:</strong> "Our print run is 6,000 copies. [...] Almost every single one of those 6,000 copies go directly into stores or directly into homes."[11. "Advertising," Razorcake.org, accessed October 28, 2016, <a title="Advertising" href="http://www.razorcake.org/advertising">http://www.razorcake.org/advertising</a>] <strong>Audience location and language or cultural considerations: </strong>Based in Los Angeles, California[12. "<a href="http://razorcake.org/category/home/">Razorcake</a>."] and distributed to over twenty countries.[13. "<a href="http://razorcake.org/mission-statement/">Mission Statement</a>."] This publication has a strong multinational appeal, as it provides music coverage for bands worldwide. In addition, the scope and variance of political and social perspective provides accessibility to numerous cultures and communities desiring alternative approach. <strong>Reader characteristics:</strong> Reader demographics are not available, but as this is a punk zine, most readers will be interested in progressive politics, activism, and counter culture. Readers are generally not going to tolerate racist, homophobic, or sexist attitudes, yet a vibrant lack of political correctness is prevalent in both readers and content. Based on evaluation of contributors, political leanings of the reader base spans from apolitical to the most extreme of philosophies. A healthy dose of humor, positivism, self-reliance, individuality and "€œDIY"€ (do it yourself) spirit permeates both versions of the publication. Noteworthy is the fact that this publication, more than many in underground culture, owns readers highly interested in the correlation between information access, privacy, laws such as the Patriot Act, and a specific form of entertainment, rather than general ethical or legal discussions of such topics.[14. "Columns," Razorcake.org, accessed October 28, 2016, <a href="http://razorcake.org/category/read/column/">http://razorcake.org/category/read/column/</a>] <strong>Knowledge of LIS subject matter:</strong> The reader base, versed in music, writing, politics by default, demonstrates LIS proclivities and knowledge. A randomly reviewed interview revealed discussion of technological obsolescence, archival, copyright concerns, and the reduction of creative ephemera and networking due to internet proliferation. While such discourse promotes at least an implicit understanding of core information issues, LIS jargon should be avoided. <h4>Conclusion: Analysis of reader characteristics and their potential impact on authors</h4> This publication presents both opportunities, and some challenges, for those from the LIS community wishing to contribute. Writers with a lack of music knowledge, including music culture, history, and social dynamic are going to have difficulty presenting anything in a relevant, engaging manner. This readership suggests intelligence, and their continual deviation from mainstream society's perception requires contributors from what some deem a rather dull profession to stretch their creativity in presentation. This readership, interested in history and ephemera, nostalgia and the technological capacity for music enjoyment, affords contributors the capacity to educate, inform, and demonstrate the LIS world in a package of immense creative potential. Feminist issues regarding topics such as female artistic expression or emerging technology skills, incorporated into information science themes, increase the potential for LIS writers to express themselves in meaningful ways that potentially fine-tune their chosen area of expertise. In addition, authors wishing to prepare for peer-reviewed writing on issues of the aforementioned information privacy and library law will find a demanding yet non-academic opportunity for publication. <strong>Last updated: </strong>October 28, 2016 <hr /> <h4>References</h4>

OldNewDate CreatedAuthorActions
March 27, 2018 @ 18:29:07 Lisa Lowdermilk
January 23, 2018 @ 13:29:42 Laurie Putnam
October 28, 2016 @ 18:43:49 Rebecca Padrick
October 28, 2016 @ 18:39:41 Rebecca Padrick
October 28, 2016 @ 18:38:45 [Autosave] Rebecca Padrick
August 6, 2015 @ 13:48:54 Laurie Putnam
August 6, 2015 @ 13:48:42 [Autosave] Laurie Putnam
November 13, 2014 @ 19:53:35 Joni Hansen
November 13, 2014 @ 19:53:19 [Autosave] Joni Hansen
November 11, 2014 @ 14:15:20 Julia Wells
November 11, 2014 @ 14:14:15 Julia Wells
November 11, 2014 @ 14:13:21 Julia Wells
November 11, 2014 @ 14:12:03 Julia Wells
November 11, 2014 @ 14:11:23 Julia Wells
November 11, 2014 @ 14:10:35 Julia Wells
March 11, 2014 @ 23:54:08 Joni Hansen
December 14, 2013 @ 02:49:07 Joni Hansen
September 23, 2013 @ 18:19:51 admin
Comments are closed.